It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...



Reply
 
LinkBack (8) Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  6 links from elsewhere to this Post. Click to view. #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-15-2007
Erik Hamzy
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Vista and Snap Server
I have just installed Windows Vista and all is running wonderfully except that I cannot connect a mapped drive to my Snap Server? Any ideas, thoughts, etc.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 01-17-2007
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by Erik Hamzy View Post
I have just installed Windows Vista and all is running wonderfully except that I cannot connect a mapped drive to my Snap Server? Any ideas, thoughts, etc.
According to Adaptec's site, some SNAP servers are not supported by Vista. I've had the same problem with my Vista setup.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 01-18-2007
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Snap server 2200
I had the same problem - our logon scripts would map the Snap Server network drives on Vista machines.

After serveral hours of trying to make it work, I created a new admin local user on the Snap Server administration pages, and used that username and password when connecting to the snap server. So now I've manually mapped connections to the shares using not my domain credentials, but the local user from the snap server.

Apart from the inconvenience it all works fine an' dandy!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 01-18-2007
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
I had the same problem - our logon scripts would map the Snap Server network drives on Vista machines.!
That should say our logon scripts WOULDN'T map the ......!!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 01-31-2007
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Elk Grove, CA 95624
Posts: 14
Raymond Zachary will become famous soon enough
Logon to SNAP Server
Several months ago I posted a similar problem regarding logging onto a SNAP 1100, which albeit old, still works well with all other computers and operating systems on the network. The problem I had was that when I typed in the logon which SNAP expected to see, Vista placed the name of my computer with a backslash in front of the logon name. The SNAP OS does not tolerate backslashes. After months of trying to solve this problem including futile discussions with MIcrosoft who could not bring themselves to address the problem because they were too hung up on whether they should be talking to a beta user at all, I finally took the approach of removing every scintilla of security from SNAP so that no logon was required. This was not too risky as I control all of the computers on the network in a home business environment and I have plenty of firewall and NAT protection. This approach worked perfectly although it is ironic that in order to make Vista (Microsoft's best effort to date on security) work, I had to remove all the security from one of my servers.

Needless to say I am not racing out to pay top dollar for Vista and will not shop until the Beta license is close to expiring. I think the days I spent on the phone trying to break through the bureacratic morass which is Microsoft makes me wonder if they have configuration control on Vista, a design and production requirement for any large software development where there is hope for proper repair and maintenance. They stuggled with this issue of real centralized configuration control on XP which is one reason it became such a kluge.

Oh well, size does matter if temporary survival is what counts.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 02-07-2007
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 3
Tony will become famous soon enough
According to Apaptec, if you are using a Snap 4100 they will not be releasing a SnapOS patch for Vista. While disabling is the security was a great workaround, it would be nice if there is a way to disable the automatic domain-backslash string in Vista...
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 02-07-2007
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
To prevent the computer name being appended to your username
I have found that if you alter the value of the LM authentication level to 2 in VISTA (see below from MS) then the computername\ is not appended to username for network login in. Still will not get me into my Snap1100 but will let me log on to my linux & xp shares. This info my give someone more knoledgable a clue as to what to try next.

[10. Network security: Lan Manager authentication level a. Background

LAN Manager (LM) authentication is the protocol that is used to authenticate Windows clients for network operations, including domain joins, accessing network resources, and user or computer authentication. The LM authentication level determines which challenge/response authentication protocol is negotiated between the client and the server computers. Specifically, the LM authentication level determines which authentication protocols that the client will try to negotiate or that the server will accept. The value that is set for LmCompatibilityLevel determines which challenge/response authentication protocol is used for network logons. This value affects the level of authentication protocol that clients use, the level of session security negotiated, and the level of authentication accepted by servers, according to the following table:

Possible settings include the following.Value Setting Description
0 Send LM & NTLM responses Clients use LM and NTLM authentication and never use NTLMv2 session security; domain controllers accept LM, NTLM, and NTLMv2 authentication.
1 Send LM & NTLM - use NTLMv2 session security if negotiated Clients use LM and NTLM authentication, and use NTLMv2 session security if the server supports it; domain controllers accept LM, NTLM, and NTLMv2 authentication.
2 Send NTLM response only Clients use NTLM authentication only and use NTLMv2 session security if the server supports it; domain controllers accept LM, NTLM, and NTLMv2 authentication.
3 Send NTLMv2 response only Clients use NTLMv2 authentication only and use NTLMv2 session security if the server supports it; domain controllers accept LM, NTLM, and NTLMv2 authentication.
4 Send NTLMv2 response only/refuse LM Clients use NTLMv2 authentication only and use NTLMv2 session security if the server supports it. Domain controllers refuse LM and accept only NTLM and NTLMv2 authentication).
5 Send NTLMv2 response only/refuse LM & NTLM Clients use NTLMv2 authentication only and use NTLMv2 session security if the server supports it; domain controllers refuse LM and NTLM (they accept only NTLMv2 authentication).
Note In Windows 95, Windows 98, and Windows 98 Second Edition, the Directory Services Client uses SMB signing when it authenticates with Windows Server 2003 servers by using NTLM authentication. However, these clients do not use SMB signing when they authenticate with these servers by using NTLMv2 authentication. Additionally, Windows 2000 servers do not respond to SMB signing requests from these clients.

Check the LM authentication level You must change the policy on the server to permit NTLM, or you must configure the client computer to support NTLMv2.

If the policy is set to (5) Send NTLMv2 response only\refuse LM & NTLM on the target computer that you want to connect to, you must either lower the setting on that computer or set the security to the same setting that is on the source computer that you are connecting from.

Find the correct location where you can change the LAN manager authentication level to set the client and the server to the same level. After you find the policy that is setting the LAN manager authentication level, if you want to connect to and from computers that are running earlier versions of Windows, lower the value to at least (1) Send LM & NTLM - use NTLM version 2 session security if negotiated.

For example, you may have to look on the domain controller, or you may have to look at the domain controller's policies.

Look on the domain controller
Note You may have to repeat the following procedure on all the domain controllers.1. Click Start, point to Programs, and then click Administrative Tools.
2. Under Local Security Settings, expand Local Policies.
3. Click Security Options.
4. Double-click Network Security: LAN manager authentication level, and then click an appropriate value in the list.

If the Effective Setting and the Local Setting are the same, the policy has been changed at this level. If the settings are different, you must check the domain controller's policy to find out whether the Network Security: LAN manager authentication level setting is defined there. If it is not defined there, look at the domain controller's policies.

Look at the domain controller's policies1. Click Start, point to Programs, and then click Administrative Tools.
2. In the Domain Controller Security policy, expand Security Settings, and then expand Local Policies.
3. Click Security Options.
4. Double-click Network Security: LAN manager authentication level, and then click an appropriate value in the list.

Note• You may also have to check policies that are linked at the site level, at the domain level, or at the organizational unit (OU) level to determine where you must configure the LAN manager authentication level.
• If you implement a Group Policy setting as the default domain policy, the policy is applied to all the computers in the domain.
• If you implement a Group Policy setting as the default domain controller's policy, the policy applies only to the servers in the domain controller's OU.
• It is a good idea to set the LAN manager authentication level in the lowest entity of necessary scope in the policy application hierarchy.

Refresh the policy after you make any changes. (If the change is at the local security settings level, the change is immediate. However, you must restart the clients before you test.)
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 02-07-2007
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 3
Tony will become famous soon enough
That is great information... I was able to connect to a local SNAP account by setting that LAN Manager setting to Send LM & NTLM: Use NTLMv2 if negotiated in my local policy. Still not working with domain logins, but this is a great step forward for business that are stuck with these unsupported SNAP server. Local accounts could potentially be created for each user.

If you want to login to your SNAP Server, try using <SNAP_SERVER_NAME>\<Local Account Name> with the setting above.

Last edited by Tony : 02-07-2007 at 09:54 PM. Reason: corrections
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 02-11-2007
Michael
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I spent hours on this... and this worked for me, as well. I have a trusty SNAP Server 2000 series and *just* bought a Buffalo TeraStation to replace it. I haven't even opened the package and thought I would Google one more time for a Vista/SNAP server solution. I'll be taking the TeraStation back tomorrow. I was concerned about it, anyway, based on the reviews I have seen. Thanks for the research...I'll try to spread this link to others.

Michael
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 02-11-2007
Ian D
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
We have a Snap Server 1100 on a workgroup at work and I spent hours trying to fix the "\" appending in front of the username until I found this thread.

For others out there in the same position as me here is a quick step by step guide on how to modify Vista and fix the backslash problem.

1) Click Start
2) Click Control Panel (not classic view)
3) Click System & Maintenance
4) Click Administrative Tools
5) Double Click Local Security Policy
6) On the left pane, click to expand Local Policies
7) On the left pane, click on Security Options
8) Now, on the right pane, near the bottom, click on
Network Security LAN Manager Authentication Level
9) On the drop down, change the default setting (NTLMv2 only) to
Send LM & NTLM - use NTLMv2 session if negotiated.

Hope this saves others the hours that I wasted!
Reply With Quote
Reply
Tags: ,



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://winvistaforums.com/windows-vista-support/9023-vista-snap-server.html
Posted By For Type Date
Re: EFG120/Vista, Can't login - Network Storage - Linksys Community Forums This thread Refback 10-10-2007 01:26 PM
Just Two Nerds » Blog Archive » Snap Server 4100 and Windows Vista This thread Refback 09-17-2007 01:42 AM
djstangl's bookmarks tagged with This thread Refback 08-30-2007 01:30 PM
Spirea - prestataire et revendeur informatique - Monter un lecteur réseau vers un partage situé sur un snap avec Windows Vista This thread Refback 08-07-2007 02:11 AM
djstangl's bookmarks tagged with This thread Refback 07-10-2007 03:38 PM
EFG120/Vista, Can't login - Network Storage - Linksys Community Forums This thread Refback 07-09-2007 02:29 PM
EFG120/Vista, Can't login - Network Storage - Linksys Community Forums This thread Refback 07-05-2007 12:59 PM
Chronicgaming.com»Blog Archive » Snap Server 4100 and Windows Vista This thread Pingback 02-10-2007 12:34 PM

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Problem create folder in SNAP SERVER unregister Windows Vista Support 2 03-24-2008 11:06 AM
Vista Incompatiblity with SNAP Server Raymond Zachary Windows Vista Networking 2 02-26-2007 05:10 PM
Seeing Other Computers and Servers Raymond Zachary Windows Vista Networking 0 12-26-2006 12:40 PM
Live Communications Server & Active Directory Compatibility agresbach Windows Vista Support 6 12-12-2006 11:20 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:52 PM.


Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin, color scheme by ColorizeIt!.
All trademarks referenced on this site are the property of their respective owners.

SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.